Responsible?

I was sitting down, reading a book, on a warm Saturday morning, in a tennis clubhouse. I was the "duty parent" - a responsible adult (don't laugh). Most of the boys (including SonOfVirge) were engaged in a match, apart from a chattering of lads who were in-between sets.

"... I learnt that negative bee plus or minus square root of bee squared minus four ay cee all over two ay..." blathered an in-betweeny.

Of course it wasn't hard to work out what he was talking about. His high-school maths classes were climbing the giddying heights of quadratic equations. The blather-recipient was obviously impressed by this feat of memory and a discussion ensued on the relevance of mathematics to life. Neither of them had the faintest clue how the abstract equations they were learning at school could possibly be attached to any real life concept. They discussed, with some considerable wit, the ways such a formula could have been discovered - again displaying complete cluelessness as to the physical relevance of the subject and why anyone would ever have wanted to study it. I can only hope that some time in what remains of their schooling years a teacher has the skills to explain how intimately those equations are linked with important real world concepts like first-person shooter game mechanics, street drag racing and football kicking.

Maybe I'm stretching a long bow here, but I see this "teaching without vision" as another aspect of the practice of deskilling. It's dumbing down life to the point where nobody needs to try to understand what they are doing. Just follow the simple step-by-step rules and the system will work smoothly. Unfortunately it's not true. It's anything but smooth. The people in the system are not machines.

If you remove the need to understand a process you remove any need for taking responsibility. Nobody cares. People break rules when it suits them. Oh dear! What shall we do? We'll introduce another set of simple rules to make sure people are following the rules. People are all different. What shall we do when someone doesn't fit the simple rule system? Since we don't understand the system we'll just have to force them to fit. It may be completely ridiculous but it's not our responsibility. We're just obeying the rules because if we don't, that other set of rules will come down like a ton of bricks.

Once you build up companies of people all following simple rules, an amazing thing happens. On a macroscopic scale you start to see emergent behaviour. You get to see a chaotic system that is inefficient and inequitable for the majority of the company's people and its customers.

Where was I heading with this discussion? It looks like turning into another anti-authoritarian rant. Yeah, it's turned. Follow orders blindly at your own peril. I'll shut up now.

Comments

You never know--it's quite possible that the boys are perfectly aware of the uses of mathematics, but have learned that it's funnier to play ignorant. I mean, the idea of some hoser standing on a bridge calculating the area under the parabolic curve described by the stone he's tossed over the side is more amusing than the idea of the same guy at his job, designing faster planes. It's not a huge leap of logic to see where such a thing as the quadratic equation might come in handy, but at that age, if you admit that you've made that leap, you're a big dork. Even when teachers go to the bother of pointing out practical applications for maths, science, grammar, spelling, et cetera, kids still pretend not to have heard.

Yeah, I thought about that for a while. I'd love to think they were playing ignorant but the more I see the less confidence I have. I suppose I am biased by recent discussions about the current methods of teaching kids to read. A career as a teacher used to be a profession. That's no longer true in Australia. Teaching is a heavily union-controlled job and I suspect a lot of Australian teachers have learnt just enough to be able to teach, then forgotten how to learn.