Sure...
Or maybe not.
Today, The Age featured an article claiming:
German job centres are offering unemployed women work as prostitutes and are obliged to cut welfare benefits of those who refuse to work in the world's oldest profession under new welfare laws.
Do I believe it? I searched Google News for similar articles. Only one source gave enough detail of the situation that triggered the news: *cough* World Net Daily. *cough*
I read the article in World Net Daily. I remembered that newspaper's name from somewhere. Ah yes. They were the ones who published a penetrating piece on the Harry Potter phenomenon and how the books encourage witchcraft and Satanism. In fact they even went so far as to quote from an article in The Onion as support! Snopes records their error for our entertainment.
Let's get back to the German brothel question. The one example quoted in WND is of a 25 year old woman who was threatened with unemployment benefit cuts when she turned down a job working in a bar in a brothel. Of course, the fundamentalist rag tarts up the story by giving it the sub-heading, "German law forces out-of-work females to take sex jobs or lose unemployment," to inflame the issue. Since when did working as a bartender count as being a sex job?
By the time the story is repeated in The Telegraph - Calcutta, the woman is supposed to have turned down a job providing "sexual services." Strangely enough, The Telegraph doesn't quote a source for its story. The Age does at least include the name of their reporter and his supposed location, Berlin. Did any reporters really do any journalism for their articles today, or did they rely on WND's impeccable journalistic record and recycle the WND report published on the 29th?
Tell me about it when the first German actually loses unemployment benefits for refusing a sex job. Even then I'll treat what I read with skepticism.